Dallas Divorce Lawyer Blog

You just finalized your divorce or custody matter, however it seems like every time you turn around you think that your child should live with you instead of the other parent primarily of the time.  Even though it is has not even been a year yet since your final orders were rendered, it just seems as though something is constantly coming up and you are genuinely concerned.  The other parent may be endangering the child’s physical welfare or emotional development such as engaging in criminal activity, drug usage, physical/mental/sexual abuse, or overall endangerment of the child.  You want to change the custody orders now but you have been told that there are certain roadblocks in requesting the modification this soon.  What should you expect?

Less than One Year Requirements 

If you are filing your petition to change the parent who has the exclusive right to designate the child’s residence in less than one year, there are specific requirements that you must follow.  In fact, you must qualify within these statutory parameters to even file your case.  The most important and crucial requirement is the affidavit that must be attached to your petition.  In fact, Texas Family Code Section 156.102 mandates that an affidavit must be attached to your pleadings and “(b) must contain, along with supporting facts, at least one of the following allegations: (1) that the child’s present environment may endanger the child’s physical health or significantly impair the child’s emotional development; (2) that the person who has the exclusive right to designate the primary residence of the child is the person seeking or consenting to the modification and the modification is in the best interest of the child; or (3) that the person who has the exclusive right to designate the primary residence of the child has voluntarily relinquished the primary care and possession of the child for at least 6 months and the modification is in the best interest of the child.”  Frequently, we see the first requirement being the grounds on which someone files a modification.  Allegations are made that something bad has happened in the other parent’s care and this is why that parent should no longer have possession of the child.  But, the key is that the allegations must be made in the affidavit.  Many people get hung up on this requirement and many times affidavits fall short on their face.

What’s in an Affidavit?

This issue was discussed recently in an appellate case from the 14th Court of Appeals in In the Interest of A.D.  There, mom appealed the trial court’s decision to allow dad to be primary in a case less than one year and said that his affidavit was not sufficient.  Mom had made several false sexual abuse allegations against dad regarding their daughter over the course of an entire year.  The trial court found that this behavior on mom’s part was physically and emotionally dangerous and detrimental to the child and therefore awarded primary to dad.  Mom requested a jury trial over the matter in which several experts and witnesses testified that mom had made severely poor decisions regarding the child and these sexual abuse allegations.  That is, even though every professional (including police, CPS, and doctors) ruled this out, she continued to pursue it.  The jury ruled that dad should continue to be primary and mom appealed arguing that the court’s decision was improper and that the dad’s affidavit was not sufficient.

However, the Court of Appeals disagreed and reiterated the standard from Texas Family Code Section 156.102(c) which states that “The Court shall deny the relief sought and refuse to schedule a hearing for modification under this section unless the court determines, on the basis of the affidavit, that facts adequate to support an allegation in (b) are stated within the affidavit.”  Therefore, the Court must look to the affidavit on its face to determine if it can move forward with a hearing on modification.  This is why it is so important that your affidavit contain all of the allegations and facts that you believe would necessitate a modification and it would not hurt to include the “magic language” from subsection (b) either.  The Court of Appeals also clarified that the trial courts are to just look to the facts of the affidavit and if they were true, would that justify having a hearing.   Therefore, this is the key part that most people miss—the trial court should have a hearing if the affidavit alleges facts showing “the child’s present environment may endanger the child’s physical health or significantly impair the child’s emotional development”.  Thus, you do not have to prove the allegations are true before a hearing is held—just have to prove that they are true at the hearing to bring about the change you are requesting.

For any additional information regarding modifications in less than one year, schedule a free consultation with Guest & Gray today.  Our family law team is ready to help.

If you are in the middle of an adoption—whether it is a stepparent, grandparent, aunt/uncle, or new parent adoption—you know that your child must have a representative in court to ensure the child’s best interest standard is being met.  Many people do not realize that there are a few options for the courts in determining what option is best for your particular case.  In adoptions, the two most primary appointments are either amicus attorney or attorney ad litem.  But, which would be best for you?

Amicus Attorney 

Amicus attorneys are appointed in termination/adoption suits not to specifically represent the child but rather to assist the court in protecting a child’s best interest.  So, unlike the attorney ad litem an amicus attorney does not have an attorney-client relationship with the child.  In fact, an amicus attorney can even relay what would otherwise be privileged communication from the child to the court if it is necessary to assist in the court’s decision.  Amicus attorneys can be appointed for a number of reasons; but typically, they are appointed when the child is young and cannot express their desires to the court unlike a child who is 12 or older.  Amicus attorneys do meet with the child and determine what their objectives are in the case; however, the amicus attorney does not have to act in favor of those objectives and must always advocate for the child’s best interest.

Attorney Ad Litem

In contract of an amicus attorney, an attorney ad litem is appointed to represent the best interest of the child and has a direct relationship with the child. Therefore, the attorney-client relationship is created with the child and any communication with the child must remain confidential at all times.  However, like the amicus attorney an attorney ad litem must at all times represent the best interest of the child.  This individual does make representations to the court as to what is in the child’s best interest but it is also in line with what the child wants.

Procedure

Regardless of which appointment is made for your termination/adoption suit, the Family Code makes it very clear that at least one of them must be appointed (and you cannot appoint both).  So, once your case begins you will petition the court to appoint the appropriate representative for the child in the case and the court will make the appointment and choose an attorney from the community to do so.  That attorney will then, upon notice of the appointment, proceed forward to fulfill their duties and obligations in the case.

For any additional information regarding amicus attorney vs. attorney ad litem or adoptions in general, schedule a free consultation with Guest & Gray today.

If you are in the middle of an adoption—whether it is a stepparent, grandparent, aunt/uncle, or new parent adoption—you know that you have to complete a social study in order to proceed forward with the adoption.  Because this is a new concept to many people, it is better to gain knowledge regarding this process beforehand to put your mind at ease.  You will find that this step is actually one of the more rewarding (absent the actual adoption day) throughout your case.  It is your chance to tell the social worker all about your family and why you should be able to adopt the child.

Purpose of Pre-Adoptive Social Study

One of the purposes of the pre-adoptive social study is to guide the Court in its decision on the termination and adoption because the social worker is literally the eyes and ears for the Court.  Reason being, the judge cannot visit your home and do a background check on all of the parties in the case to determine whether or not the adoption would be in the best interest of the child.  Therefore, a social worker is appointed to do that and much more.

Process of Pre-Adoptive Social Study

Once appointed, the social worker will schedule a time to visit with the adopting family and all parties in the case.  The appointments will be separate (separate house meeting for each household).  Once at your home, the social worker will meet with the family all together and then have individual interviews to gather more information regarding each person on a more intimate level.  The social worker will go over your background information (childhood to present), medical history, drug and/or criminal history, CPS history, your thoughts about the other party/parties, and your requests. If the children are of the appropriate age, the social worker will also interview them individually.  In addition to the home visit, the social worker will also go through all of your references (which you provide) and will contact all professionals appropriate in the case.

Once the “investigation” portion of the social study is completed, the social worker will then write their written report to the Court which will ultimately be filed and will be disseminated to all parties in the case.   In true impatient fashion, once the social study is received everyone flips directly to the recommendation.  As long as the adoption is ultimately recommended by the social worker then you would proceed forward with a final hearing.  If the adoption is not recommended, you/your attorney would need to speak with the social worker and proceed forward from that point.  It might require doing some steps that would satisfy the social worker to the point of recommending the adoption or it could possibly require an additional home visit.  The key is to just remain calm and patient throughout the process.

For any additional information regarding pre-adoptive social studies or adoptions in general, schedule a free consultation with Guest & Gray today.

Are you facing a divorce with your spouse and you are concerned that you are not the father of your child?  You have probably always had that feeling (given your spouse’s cheating history) that you are not the child’s biological father but you just have never acted on that feeling.  However, now that you are facing a divorce you feel that it is important to raise this as an issue and deny your paternity.  Absent addressing all of the issues that can arise with a denial of paternity, you need to know what can happen in the interim while the case is pending.  You may not be the biological father, but you still may be the presumed father.

What is a presumed father?

You are the presumed father for all legal purposes if one of the following is true: you are married to the mother and the child was born during the marriage; you married the mother before the birth of the child even if the marriage could be invalid; you married the mother before the birth of the child and your name is on the birth certificate.  This means, even if you are not the biological father of the child you are the father in the eyes of the law.  Therefore, the judge can make orders according to that legal fact and most likely will do so.

Presumed fathers can be made to pay child support, even if they are not the biological father

If you have a temporary orders hearing coming up and the issue of denial of paternity is not on the court’s docket then the court can make orders with respect to visitation and even child support. Yes, you read that correctly—even child support.  You could be ordered to pay child support on the child until the denial of paternity is set for a hearing and granted by the court.  In fact, Texas Family Code Section 160.309 commands that the court must do so.  Reason being—it is not the child’s fault that you have decided to question your paternity now at this point and most courts will not leave a child without support.  You are the presumed father and therefore the Family Code allows the court to make appropriate orders in line with such.

Therefore, the suggestion would be that if you are in fact going to question your paternity you need to do so in the beginning and make sure the appropriate pleadings/requests are on file and a hearing over this issue should be heard before any other.  That may eliminate any interim orders of child support, or it may not. It will depend upon the court and the facts of your case.

It is essential that if you have any question of paternity that it must be raised at the time that you have this question.  You cannot wait in an attempt to avoid payment of child support or any other duty that a presumed father has because a court would not be too keen on someone trying to dodge their obligations.  If you are facing this issue, you sh0uld meet with a family law attorney who can advise you along the way.  Schedule a free consultation today.

You have been served with a petition for divorce and it states you have to file an answer by 10:00 a.m. on the Monday next after the expiration of 20 days.  However, you have been working things out with your soon-to-be-ex spouse and you guys have agreed upon everything. Your spouse tells you that the service part is just part of the legal process and you do not have to do anything because you have already signed the agreed decree.  However, once everything is said and done the district clerk’s office mails you a copy of the decree and it is not the one you signed.  In fact, it contains terms that are the complete opposite as to what you agreed.  You are shocked and you have no idea what to do; according to the final decree mailed to you, your ex-spouse is taking the children, the home, and the car.

You contact an attorney and find out that your ex-spouse actually waited for your answer period to expire and then went before the judge and asked for a “default” divorce on the basis of you not answering or making an appearance.  The judge, not knowing the background of the case and relying upon the ex-spouse’s allegations, granted the default divorce and now you must work to get that reversed.

The good news is you do have a form of recourse.  You can file a motion to set aside the default judgment and a motion for new trial.  In order to be successful on this type of motion, it is important that you know the grounds for doing so.  Luckily, several appellate courts have discussed this test, also known as the Craddock elements.  It was recently discussed again by the Texarkana 6th District Court of Appeals in In the Matter of the Marriage of Lucas Woods and Jessica Woods and In the Interest of L.K.L.W. and S.B.L.W., Children.  This Court held that to analyze whether a motion for new trial should be granted and to set aside a default judgment, the trial courts must look at the following factors: “(1) the failure of the defendant to answer before judgment was not intentional, or the result of conscious indifference on his part, but was due to a mistake or accident; (2) the motion for a new trial sets up a meritorious defense; and (3) granting the motion will occasion no delay or otherwise work an injury to the plaintiff.”

In determining the first element, the Court basically said that if a person is sued and they just do not file an answer because they do not care then that person cannot claim that they were not being intentionally indifferent.  But, if you do not file an answer because of representations of your spouse, then that obviously is a legitimate reason (at least for this appellate court).  In this particular case, the wife did not file an answer because she and her husband had worked out an agreement prior to even filing the divorce and were actually already living out that agreement with their children.  Therefore, the Court held that she did not intentionally fail to file an answer and that she did not ignore the petition.  She was legitimately relying upon her spouse’s representations that she did not need to answer.

For the second factor, the Court was looking to determine if she had a defense in her affidavit (attached to her motions) that would have led the trial court to make a different decision or reach a different outcome on the final divorce.  So, the Court is asking the question: do you have any information that if given to the court would have completely changed the court’s mind and would have caused them to do something different than what was decided in the decree?  If so, this is a meritorious defense. In the case at hand, as stated before the parties had an agreement and the case involved children.  The spouses had agreed (or so the wife thought) that she would have the exclusive right to determine the primary residence of the children and that the father would have standard possession and they had been exercising this agreement for about a year or more.  The wife was specific in her affidavit as to why the decree was wrong (agreement, children were suffering due to switch, etc.).  The Court concluded that all of this information was sufficient to meet the second element because the final decree did in fact “modify the living arrangements of the children and raise concerns regarding their best interest.”

Finally, on the third factor, it is one that you must plead and then the other side has the burden of proving otherwise.  Therefore, the Court held that once you state that you would not injure the Plaintiff in having the default judgment set aside and granting the motion for new trial, the burden shifts to the Plaintiff to prove that they would in fact suffer some sort of injury (time, money, etc.).   In this case, the Court held that the husband failed to produce any proof to this effect and the wife was very timely with her filings in that it was on file within four days after the trial court entered the decree.

Thus, the wife met all three elements and the appellate Court reversed the trial court’s denial of the motion for new trial and remanded back to the trial court.

If this has happened to you, it is important that you not delay and get your pleadings on file for a motion to set aside and motion for new trial as soon as possible.  The appellate courts are very analytic in reviewing the pleadings to determine if the elements were met. Do not think that you are without any way to “fix” this problem—you have a solution but there is a time sensitive deadline.  Consult with an attorney to discuss your case in detail.

You just finished the first big hearing in all family law cases that sets the status quo of the case and gives you an idea as to how the judge is leaning in your situation—the temporary orders hearing.  You do not like the outcome and you feel that the judge was wrong in their decision.  But, what do you do about it?  Are you stuck with this ruling or can you appeal it?  Unfortunately, the answer is “it depends.”  Like all family law cases, the outcome will depend upon the venue and court you are located in.

If you are located in Dallas County, the answer is yes.  There are district and associate judges in all family courts in Dallas County and all temporary orders hearings are held in front of the associate judges.  Therefore, if you do not like the associate judge’s ruling on your temporary orders hearing you can take another bite at the apple in front of the district judge by requesting a “de novo hearing.”  The key is, however, that you have an extremely limited time in order to do so and many people miss their deadline.  Specifically, the legislature amended Texas Family Code Section 201.015(a) this past year to now state that “a party may request a de novo hearing before the referring court by filing with the clerk of the referring court a written request not later than the third working date after the date the party receives notice of the substance of the associate judge’s report.”  So, basically the day that the associate judge renders their judgment—you must have your de novo on file within three working days from that date.  If your de novo hearing request is timely and properly filed (there are specifics on its contents also), then the referring court (the district judge) will set your de novo hearing.  This is your second chance where the district judge will re-hear the issues and evidence that are on appeal from the associate judge’s ruling.  Just a side note that many people are confused on—the associate judge’s ruling remains in full force and effect until it is changed by the district judge. Therefore, you do need to comply with it until or when/if the district judge changes it.

If your case is in Rockwall County or Kaufman County, the answer is yes; but it is a higher hurdle and burden.  You cannot appeal temporary orders hearings in these actual counties because you only have one judge—the district judge.  But, you can appeal the decision of the district judge to the appellate courts on a temporary orders level through a petition for writ of mandamus.   The legislature did not want to leave people without a vehicle to appeal temporary orders and so this option is available.  The only problem with this type of pleading or action is that the burden is very high.  In fact, if you are going to try to appeal it will most likely be based upon the “abuse of discretion” prong which is extremely difficult to prove.  This is basically claiming that the district judge abused their discretion when making the ruling in the temporary orders.  Therefore, you might just be spinning your wheels and many people do not end up filing a mandamus for several reasons (including the fact that you still have to have your final trial in front of the same district judge who will then know you filed a mandamus on them).

But, there are other options other than an appeal but you may be limited in those as well.  Reason being, the only other option in changing temporary orders is requesting a modification of them and you can only do that when there has been a substantial change since the orders were rendered.  Otherwise, if things remain the same and nothing new has happened then you are pretty much stuck. You can request a social study to have a social worker do an investigation if custody is an issue—this might help change the outcome at final trial in your favor.  You can also request to attend mediation which is where the parties try to work it out with their attorneys and a neutral third-party attorney who does not have an interest in the case except to settle it.

The last resort in these matters is always a final trial which you have to be fully prepared for because that is the hearing where all evidence is heard and final decisions are rendered as to property, parties and children.  You never want to take this lightly and this is why all intermediary steps that you desire to have (such as a social study) must be completed.

If you have any additional questions regarding your family law matter, schedule a free consultation with Guest & Gray today and allow our experienced legal staff assistant you.

You have just finished a long bench trial in your divorce and you do not feel that the trial court was correct in its division of your assets and liabilities.  In fact, you feel that the judge was completely wrong and you got the short end of the stick.  So, you wonder what you can do about it.  You absolutely can appeal, but you have a short window frame in order to do so and it is imperative you take certain steps in appealing.

The 7th District Court of Appeals in Amarillo makes this fact abundantly clear in Kenneth Dale Rodgers, Appellant vs. Mary Elaine Rodgers, Appellee in determining whether or not (a) “the trial court abused its discretion in the division of the property” which (b) “materially affected a just and right division of the marital estate.”   In that case, the husband was very unhappy with the property division and he appealed.  However, the husband failed to request findings of fact and conclusions of law from the trial court within the required amount of time. Therefore, the appellate court had no idea what the basis of the trial court’s ruling was and was forced to go along with it.  This is because, as the Court of Appeals held, you must request findings of fact and conclusions of law from the trial court and the trial court must then file those within a certain period of time. This allows the Court of Appeals to determine why the trial court held what it held.  The record sometimes helps, but findings of fact and conclusions of law are obviously more solid and preferred by the appellate courts.

When you have a bench trial (trial before judge, not jury), Texas Rules of Civil Procedure Rules 296 and 297 mandate that you must file your request for findings of fact and conclusions of law from the trial court “within twenty days after the judgment is signed” and then the trial court must “file its findings of fact and conclusions of law within twenty days after a timely request has been made.”  If you fail to do this, then “the trial court is presumed to have made all findings of fact necessary to support its judgment, and it must be affirmed on any legal theory that is supported by the evidence.” Rodgers v. Rodgers.

The moral of the story—you need an attorney at all times.  There are specific deadlines that must be met when preparing to appeal a trial court’s decision.  In addition to the findings of fact and conclusions of law, you also must have your appeal on file by a certain date.   There are too many deadlines to delay, contact an attorney as soon as your divorce is finalized and if there is any doubt in your mind regarding the trial court’s order.

You have a final decree of divorce and you were either ordered to surrender a certain asset to your ex-spouse and you have not or you are the ex-spouse who is the recipient of the asset and have not received it yet.  Regardless of which situation you are in, one can be pretty certain that an enforcement action is in your near future.  The question becomes what type of relief can be sought on this type of case.  This question is answered clearly as a big “no” in In re Cherilyn Ann Kinney, Relator by the Fifth District Court of Appeals in Dallas.

In some suits for enforcement (most commonly in suits to enforce child support), one means of relief sought is jail time–confinement of up to 60 days in county jail to be exact.  However, in suits for enforcement of property division where one spouse was ordered a certain amount of money in the decree for a debt, lien, retirement division, etc. then jail time is not appropriate.  In this particular case, the wife was awarded one of the homes and to compensate the husband he was awarded$40,000.00 secured by an owelty lien on the residence awarded to wife which the wife had to pay within six months of signing the decree.   Needless to say, she did not pay the $40,000.00 within the time ordered and so her ex-husband filed an enforcement to make her do so.  Unfortunately, they asked for jail time and the trial judge did just that and the wife was arrested on the spot and placed in the county jail.

On appeal, the Court of Appeals held that the “Texas Constitution provides, ‘No person shall ever be imprisoned for a debt’.” Tex. Const. art. 1, §18.  In fact, the Texas Family Code is specific as to what property divisions are enforceable by contempt and that contempt does not mean imprisonment.  Specifically, Texas Family Code Section 9.012(b) states “A court may not, enforce by contempt an award in a decree of divorce or annulment of a sum of money payable in a lump sum or in future installments payments in the nature of debt, except for (1) a sum of money in existence at the time the decree was rendered; or (2) a matured right to future payments.  Therefore, the Court of Appeals did a legal analysis and concluded that the only way to determine if contempt is an option in an enforcement action, the decree must be specific enough—“the divorce decree must indicate the funds existed at the time the decree was rendered or specify particular community funds from which the amount is to be paid.”

Therefore, the Court of Appeals issued a bright line rule as to what remedy is available to the trial court in an enforcement action of this nature.  Specifically, the Court held that “A trial court may invoke its contempt power only to enforce delivery of specific property or an award of a right to future property or the delivery of a sum of money in existence at the time the decree was rendered or a matured right to future payments.”   Basically, the Court can order that the property be delivered or the payments be made and possibly award some attorneys’ fees.  But, in order to seek contempt you must fit within this rule the Court issued recently.

If you have a piece of property or sum of money that is owed to you from your divorce decree, do not wait to contact an attorney.  There is a 2 year statute of limitations and you need to know the options you have. Contact a family law attorney at Guest & Gray today for a free consultation.

There are several courts within Kaufman County, but only two of them hear divorce, custody, Child Protective Service (CPS), and IV-D or Attorney General cases.  If you file for divorce or custody in Kaufman County, the case would be filed in the Kaufman County District Clerk’s office and then the clerk randomly assigns the cases between the 86th Judicial District Court and the 422nd Judicial District Court.  Because of this random assignment, you cannot choose which court your case will be assigned in.

While some CPS and IV-D cases are heard by our district judges, most are heard by the Associate Judges.  Judge Snarr is the current Associate Judge on the CPS cases and Judge Martinez is the current Associate Judge on the IV-D cases.  IV-D or Attorney General cases are all child support cases started by the Attorney General’s office meaning the Attorney General is the petitioner.  The courtroom for CPS and IV-D is the same one and it is located at the South Campus in Kaufman County, not the actual courthouse on the square.

As you can imagine, all four of the judges have different policies/standards in these types of cases.

Contact information for each court is as follows:

Kaufman County Courthouse: 100 W Mulberry, Kaufman, Texas 75142

South Campus Courthouse: 3003 S. Washington, Kaufman Texas 75142

86th Judicial District Court, Telephone 972-932-0251

422nd Judicial District Court, Telephone 972-932-0257

CPS Court Administrator, Telephone: 903-645-5695

You are divorced and in your final orders you were awarded spousal maintenance on the basis of your disability and inability to earn sufficient income.  So, you went through all of the stages of proving your disability and proving that you could not earn the money that you need to meet your minimum reasonable needs and the judge ordered that your ex-spouse a certain amount per month to you for a certain period of time.  As you know, spousal maintenance is governed by Chapter 8 of the Family Code and with respect to a disabled spouse, it does state that maintenance can be ordered for as long as the disability persists (longer than the statutorily limited period of time).  If it is nearing the ending date of your receipt of the monthly spousal support payments, you are becoming worried because you do not know what you are going to do at this point.  Can you seek further maintenance from the Court because you are still disabled and need the money to survive?

This question was directly addressed in Stephanie Ann Novick v. Andrew A. Shervin by the Fifth District Court of Appeals in Dallas.  There, the trial court held that the wife was “presently disabled” and ordered that the husband should pay her “$2000 per month for 24 months.”  When the time was drawing near for the husband’s payments to cease, the wife filed a motion to modify to continue the support payments and the trial court dismissed that claim to which the wife appealed.  Therefore, the Dallas Court of Appeals had to determine whether or not the trial court erred in failing to honor the wife’s request in continuing the spousal support payments.  In doing do, the Court reviewed a few other appellate cases involving this particular issue to seek guidance which led the Court to render a bright line rule to determine whether or not the support payments could be continued.

The Court held, “An award of spousal maintenance in a divorce decree is properly the subject of a motion for continuance only if the decree indicates the trial judge intended to make the award pursuant to section 8.054(b) rather than 8.054(a).”  Section 8.054(b) allows a trial court to find the spouse disabled (giving guidance as to how and what it means) and in finding the spouse to be disabled, the trial court will make an award of maintenance.  This award can be made subject to periodic request based upon the request of either party and also subject to a motion to modify.  However, Section 8.504(a)  places a duration limit on how long the court can award the maintenance for (5 years) and states that a trial court must render the shortest period possible unless the spouse’s ability to earn income is totally diminished by physical or mental disability.    The key for this Court was that you can seek continuance of the maintenance if the award was under Section 8.054(b).  An example of this type of award would be where a spouse is found to be permanently disabled, awarded spousal maintenance for longer than 5 years, and the Court also order that the spouse receiving support can seek continuance beyond the court-ordered termination date.

Therefore, based upon these sections, the Court held that they have to look to final decrees in each case to determine how the trial court awarded the maintenance.   If this test outlined is not met, then the continuation cannot be granted.   In the present case, the Court denied the wife’s appeal stating that the trial court held she was “presently disabled” and limited the duration to 24 months which was less than the maximum amount of time of duration and did not expressly provide a provision that would allow for the wife to file a motion to seek continuance of the maintenance.

Appellate cases are important because they provide looking glasses into the future as to what would happen if you do not take care of your case while still in the trial court phase.  Thus, as you determine from this article, it is imperative to ensure that your rights are protected in the final order that is rendered by the trial judge—it is imperative that you ensure that the correct language is used so that you are not completely limited in the future.  If you believe that you might have a spousal maintenance claim or have already been awarded spousal maintenance and need assistance in determining whether you can seek a continuation, contact Guest & Gray for a free consult.